View Single Post
  #25   Report Post  
Old October 24th 07, 11:15 AM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,talk.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
Whata Fool Whata Fool is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jun 2007
Posts: 413
Default Fossil Fool Fluff-heads Don't Fight Fires!

"Szczepan Bia³ek" wrote:

If you burn plants in the natural manner when the ALL CO2 will be used by
plants. But if you remove the SO2 and the fly ash from the smoke when only
some percent of CO2 will be used by plants (because "the lack of one element
restrain growth of plants"). It is the only sensible explanation of the "The
decline in global sink" SO2 and fly ash are nutrient for plants.
S*


I don't think plants are involved in the decline in global sink,
it is mostly the ocean that is getting more concentrated CO2 and
resists absorbtion of more.
And deforestation is another loss of sink, there are less
plants in those areas. But with increased CO2, all plants
should grow faster or bigger or something better.

I am not sure sulphur is needed for plants, but it may
affect solar absorption in the atmosphere and may affect the
precipitation of clouds into rain.

Most plant burning is done in the bellies of animals,
which may do a very good job of using all nutrients present.