On Oct 26, 7:36 pm, qzectb wrote:
On Oct 26, 7:09 pm, William Asher wrote:



Dude:

You're arguing with a bot.

A week ago, I promised myself I wouldn't get drawn in. grrr

A week ago you published your paragraph on 'thermal inertia'. This is
a contemporary Bunnie fartation. This is the propaganda slant used to
explain why the supposed heat retained by the 1/3 increase of CO2
cannot be detected, yet. The idea promoted is that 'thermal inertia'
is gaining and will eventually show up, so we should go ahead and
believe in what cannot be documented scientifically.

And then you forget, that the main premise of AGW, especially from
their main Bunnie Fartist, algore, is that it is human CO2 that is
melting the polar ice. Your example of 'thermal inertia' and the
boiling pot of water shows your complete invalidity in physics of heat
energy. All of the energy can be located from the burner to the water
in the pot in this example.

The temperatures have been high for a long time causing the ice to
melt. Temperatures are barely fluctuating in recent years, not nearly
enough to cause melting of the ice that would not occur otherwise. To
see the ice melting now, does not in any way indicate that we are
causing the heat to make it melt. But this is the Bunnie Fart you
emit, and the proof of your nonunderstanding and willingness to
distort basic facts of physics and chemistry.

KD