Crackles McFarly wrote in
:

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:41:04 +0000 (UTC), William Asher
sayd the following:

CraMFar:

BillyAss

CramFar:

Mine is way way more creative. Yours is obvious and, frankly, very
seventh grade, maybe even younger. Want to have a second crack (no pun
intended) at yours? I mean, you are always so happy-go-lucky and now you
seem a little, well, ****ed off.

Anyway, didja do the plots?

How come you guys are all like "do science!" until someone actually asks
you to do science and then you are all like "don't like science?" What
is up with that anyway? I think the issue is that none of you skeptics
really understand any of this climate stuff enough to have a coherent
discussion and stay on topic. Did you even read any of Kerry Emmanuel's
papers on cyclone intensification and figure out for yourself what
precisely the issue is? I suspect that you, like all the other skeptics,
get spoon-fed the issue-du-jour and parrot it faithfully back here.
(Some ****** somewhere claims that decreasing hurricane frequency means
climate isn't warming and you read that and start salivating like a rat
pressing a button for a pellet of food.) Display some deeper
understanding. Explain to me why the increasing likelihood of a storm
becoming a major cyclone is not a symptom of a warming climate.

--
Bill Asher