On 26 Nov, 15:23, Weatherlawyer wrote:

Pity Mike Tullet hasn't got an impartial
attitude. He might be clever but if his bent is only to deride the
man, he shows a stupid lack of insight.

Like others who follow science rigorously, how can you give an
credence to someone who doesn't publish his methods? As well as his
brazen use of the popular press to amplify all of his remarks along
with his rather blinkered view on verification (judging from personal
replies to people on here) - don't you think we have grounds to be a
little sceptical and derisory?!

Then again - you're quite a rare breed so probably stand in Piers'
court on this one.

Richard