"Richard Dixon" wrote in message
...
On 26 Nov, 15:23, Weatherlawyer wrote:

Pity Mike Tullet hasn't got an impartial
attitude. He might be clever but if his bent is only to deride the
man, he shows a stupid lack of insight.

Like others who follow science rigorously, how can you give an
credence to someone who doesn't publish his methods? As well as his
brazen use of the popular press to amplify all of his remarks along
with his rather blinkered view on verification (judging from personal
replies to people on here) - don't you think we have grounds to be a
little sceptical and derisory?!

Then again - you're quite a rare breed so probably stand in Piers'
court on this one.

Richard

---------------------
Had the mis-fortune of reading The Express on a return plane trip
yesterday(27th) . Corbyn has another big headline along the usual lines. At
least this time the Met Office were quoted and said they couldn't see any
similar dire signs. Other articles included a headline about a covent (sic)
schoolgirl being run over and all the TV listings were one hour out of
synch! You'd think two things journalists might be able to do is use a spell
checker and format a page. On the other hand...............

Dave.