"Waghorn" wrote in message
...
He may be a 'charlaton' and a 'self publicist',however some recent results
suggest his ideas may not
be so mad or easily dismissed-

There may well be something in it but the point remains that he
consistently refuses to publish or explain his methadology.
Now that goes against everything the scientific community stands
for and I'm not surprised he isn't taken seriously.
Perhaps he's worried that he won't make so much money at the bookies?
It's a pity really, I don't think he's mad I just wish he would share his
ideas with the rest of us.

Col
--
Bolton, Lancashire.
160m asl.
http://www.reddwarfer.btinternet.co.uk