View Single Post
  #19   Report Post  
Old December 25th 07, 12:12 AM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.geo.meteorology,alt.politics.republicans,sci.physics
Rich Rich is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2007
Posts: 88
Default Can kdthrge even do simple physics? Nope..

Kurt Lochner wrote:
'bitch' deleted and bleated at:


[... dead text cut ]

Do you spammers get paid by the word or what?

The reliability of wikipedia is pretty well established nowadays,
some colleges now refuse to accept it as source material.


Henh! Well, it's not like I think of right-wingers as literate
enough for anything more than a quick wiki reference.


The reflection is on you, not some unspecified 'they'.

Other than
than your reference to wolfram, I see no need to meticulously
quote higher educational sources for you right-wing denialists..


Clearly you can't use your own words.

It's not like you right-wingers can accurately quote
anything past your usual grade-school comprehensions..

Yeah, never mind that Kent Dethridge repeatedly fscked-up
his own 'scientific terms' about "energy" and "power", much
less the reference to the Stefan Boltzman equation..

And here's the first mistake Kent was trying to run away from..

"The same force applied to heavy truck as a small car,
will cause the vehicles to absorb the same kinetic
energy. The truck will be moving faster than the
lighter car"

Yeah, some 'typo' that was..

I've not seen an AGW believer who can accurately qu[..]


Maybe you need to pull your head out, and smell the textbooks..


It did not work for that, that's clear.

Cheers,

Rich

--See subject header for details..