Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:03:51 -0800, David sayd
the following:

Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:44:13 -0800, David sayd
the following:

Crackles McFarly wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:58:04 -0800, David sayd
the following:

If we are to
make a dent we will all (China, India and Peoria) need to sacrifice 'til
it hurts. I realize that this concept is foreign to most Amerikkkan
people, and that is why I'd really not mind it too bad if all us
unworthy monkeys did get wiped off the face of the Earth.
You start first and then maybe some will join in.

Deal?


Lots of us have already started, Crackles.

Good for you, now leave the rest of us alone please.

Or do you not want others to enjoy freedom?

I don't drive my car with the intent to destroy the atmosphere, please
don't make it seem that I, and others, do.


Good Day sir.

Your concept of freedom is flawed. Freedom doesn't mean anarchy.


Anarchy? My buying the car I WANT is anarchy?

Half the people buying cars that increase danger to the other half is
insane. What if I want to driven APC around town?

If freedom requires a clarifier then it is no longer freedom.

Freedom requires taking responsibility.

How would you like the freedom of speech defined to a list of hundreds
of exceptions?

In this context there are no absolutes.


Cars aren't the problem anyway.

Why do you want poor people to pay as much as 25% more for a
car/truck/suv? Shouldn't we help the poor spend as little as possible?

I don't really care about what you call poor people. They are wealthy
beyond belief to most of the world's great unwashed.