Thread: comments guys
View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old January 28th 08, 02:44 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
Stewart Robert Hinsley Stewart Robert Hinsley is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2006
Posts: 206
Default comments guys

In message
,
Dick Lovett writes
On Jan 28, 1:070 wrote:
In message , Ron Button
writes


I don't have the literature to hand, but supposedly carbon isotope
ratios demonstrate the anthropogenic source of the additional
atmospheric carbon dioxide.
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley


As far as I am aware - source Hadley Centre - it has not been possible
to measure the isotopic signal of anthropgenic CO2
since 1945 due to atomic bomb contamination of the atmospheric.

Dick Lovett
Charlbury


Even if true, that would still leave 100 years of signal. (I know that
atomic weapons testing has messed up the atmospheric C-14 equilibrium,
which makes radiocarbon dating of recent material problematical. However
it is C-13 concentrations which are the smoking gun for anthropogenic
emissions, and it is not obvious why atomic weapons testing would affect
this.)

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=87

--
Stewart Robert Hinsley