View Single Post
  #13   Report Post  
Old February 23rd 08, 04:07 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.skeptic,sci.geo.meteorology
[email protected] alanmc95210@yahoo.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jun 2007
Posts: 127
Default Global Cooling Update: GISS Registers Largest Single Year-to-yearJanuary Temperature Drop Ever!

On Feb 23, 6:04*am, dave wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 21, 6:24 am, dave wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 19, 1:25 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
*Nope, you are still too stupid to know the difference betweenclimate
and
weather,
(cut crap)
* Climate is what you EXPECT, *weather is what you GET.
*Didn't expect snow *in Greece or Saudi Arabia did you Vendicar?
What's the probability that this will happen with *exponentially
increasing
worldwide temperatures? *I'd guess somewhere between slim and none-
A. McIntire
Or Brazilian tornadoes...


Anomalous weather phenomena are expected to increase due to global
warming; *snow on the Mediterranean MAY be such a sympton. *It might be
prudent to assume that it is, as opposed to latching onto the snow as
simplistic false proof that there is no warming.


*That's wrong! * With more CO2 in the atmosphere, there would
theroretically be little change in the tropics, *where the CO2 effect
is swamped by water vapor. *Most of the change in temerature would be
in the dryer areas closer to the poles. * The average temperature
gradient between equator and poles would drop, REDUCING weather
volatility- A. McIntire


* (cut)


The Mediterranean is not the tropics.- Hide quoted text -


What's THAT got to do with anything? Do you suffer from simple
reading comprehension?

"Or Brazilian tornadoes... "

Most of Brazil IS in the tropics. My point was, your hypothesis of
increased weather volatility due to global warming is a bunch of crap!
Models predict a reduced temperature gradient between equator and
poles, and that would REDUCE volatility-