Thread: 18:40
View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old March 21st 08, 10:32 AM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
Weatherlawyer Weatherlawyer is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 18:40

On Mar 21, 12:50 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

Mar 21 18:40
http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html

A most unstable spell. Nothing knew there.

Sum previous stuff:

1997
11 August **12:43
16 September **18:50
9 October **12:22

1998

1999
16 February **06:39
17 March **18:48

2000
22 August **18 :51

2001

2002
20 Apr **12:48

2003

20 Aug **00:48
3 Sept **12:34
18 Oct **12:31
25 Oct **12:50

2004

2005
2 Apr **00:50
3 Sept **18:45
25 Sept **06:41

2006
7 Sept **18:42

2007
24 Apr **06:36
11 Sept **12:44

2008
21 Mar **18:40


Having removed the dates whose solar declinations are not as close as
they might be, I can look up what earthquakes were taking place during
or shortly after the spells left.

Ditto for tropical storms. Which still leaves a data collection agency
for other storms short of a suitable argument for exactitude. But
fortunately we have as a control: Great Britain. And there are
suitable records of weather types over there. Here is one example:
http://www.climate-uk.com/monthly/0801.htm
http://www.climate-uk.com/monthly/0802.htm

To get the desired year and month you just change the numbers at the
end of the URL.

Here is a list of what is available along with what should be
available shortly.
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.sc...a32f2e99df224#

I wonder if the MetO still has its data. Something went wrong with
their data about 1994/96~ish so I can't recommend it.

All in all it is rather hop-scotch. But hardly chaos theory.