Robert Blass wrote:
160 Square Miles of Antarctica is very very very tiny compared to it's
overall size.

Why is this even news?

Because, as presented and without context, the story gives the false
impression that this is a major issue of frantic proportions.

Context has been asked for, but Mr. Coppock chooses to ignore those
requests and therefore fosters the false perceptions.

Until context is provided, this isn't news, but propaganda.