I just noticed the similarities in these runs:

Mar 21 18:40
Mar 29 21:47
Apr 6 03:55
Apr 12 18:32
Apr 20 10:25
http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/phase/phase2001gmt.html

But then there is this one

On Mar 14, 12:30 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Mar 13, 11:11 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

14th to 21st March 2008. The time of the phase is 10:46. Which is
similar to the last phase, in that it should provide anticyclonic
weather.

However things are not working out that way so far.

So here we are 5 minutes into a new spell and things are looking
exactly the same as they did at the start of the last:
http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html

I don't know what's going on over Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas and
Louisiana. There is nothing on this site to compare to the yellow
squares on the above site:
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/wwa/

But there is a lot of cyclogenesis (stormy weather) there.

Points to watch out for:

On the NEIC board that lists the dates of recent earthquakes with a
magnitude over 5:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/...quakes_big.php

Look out for a day that reports no such quakes. This is a new thing
learned so it might contain errors but it seems that when there are
violent storms due whose potential inner pressures at sea level are
likely to be as low as the 960's millibars,

.....there is always an hiatus in the list.

I have noticed the hiatus in times past but never made the connection
until looking at the Aussie site he
http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/nmoc/l...DCODE=IDX0033&...

And following this warning is a much less gentle one where there will
be two or three consecutive earthquakes on that list that are in
almost the same place. I am not sure where the first series takes
place but the same recurs when the storm is over and the following
seems to apply:

Not quite.

But close. Seasoned Weatherlawyer fans will be keeping notes on this
sort of thing.
I only wish I was as sensible.

For storms in the South West Indian Ocean, this series seems to be
Vanuatu some 120 degrees distant.

I expect yet more tropical storms and there is still the residue of
the storm that passed through Britain last Monday to fade into the
background too.

That one is at present over Estonia and Latvia, with the one that
crossed Britain a day or so later about to approach Norway both at 990
millibars.

I believe that when they reach 1000 to 1005 mb there will be a large,
maybe a very large earthquake. (As a warning the prelude will be some
uncertain or plain wrong weather forecasting from the various national
agencies.)

So the next spell but one will be very similar to the last one, the
present spell will be virtually the same as the next and the last in
the series will not be totally dissimilar to the pair.

And I am somewhat at a loss to forecast any of them.
Or not, as the case appears to be.
Interesting, no?

Snels' Law. Sometimes called: Snellius Descartes' law:

"The law says that the ratio of the sines of the angles of incidence
and of refraction is a constant that depends on the media.
In optics, the law is used in ray tracing to compute the angles of
incidence or refraction, and in experimental optics to find the
refractive index of a material."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snell's_law

Now, suppose that the angle of incidence is that of gravity acting
upon the gyroscope; earth. It stands to reason that glitches in the
dissipation of gravitational attraction will show up in the inertia of
large bodies as some sort of streak through any set up harmonic.

But before considering what that might be one has to consider the
harmonic as a period in stasis. At any particular frozen moment, the
moon is acting upon the earth according to geometrical progressions
noted by Newton.

However arbitrary departures from these geometric progressions are
caused by the unevennesses of both the surface of the moon and the
surface of the earth. As the masses of both celestial spheres is too
great for comparatively minor errors in escapement of the mechanism,
the system has to divest itself of the energy differential somehow
other than as celestial dynamics.

It is this transduction of forces that powers stellar systems. And on
earth causes earthquakes and weather.

And it is the angles of incidentae and refractions that concern the
mathematical deduction of the likely whereabouts of the relevant
geophenomena.

But I don't have a clue how to get at it. I wouldn't know how to
resolve the angle that storms and earthquakes make on the surface of
the earth. And I don't know if I should be looking at sines or
cosines.

For all I know I aught to be looking at tangents. It certainly seems
more appropriate, considering orbit and the rest of it. Ah well, off
to bed I think .....and maybe dream.