View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Old April 5th 08, 07:07 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
Roger Coppock Roger Coppock is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: May 2005
Posts: 1,360
Default Yes, The Continental USA is Warming Faster

On Apr 5, 9:15*am, chemist wrote:
On Apr 5, 5:05 pm, Roger Coppock wrote:



On Apr 5, 8:21 am, chemist wrote:


On Apr 5, 4:11 pm, Roger Coppock wrote:


To confirm what several other people posted,
the continental USA is warming faster than the rest of the globe.


According to the satellite Microwave Sounding Unit data
from Remote Sensing Systems, the globe from 82 degrees
North to 70 degrees South latitude warmed at 1.8 K per
century, while the continental USA warmed at 2.8K per
century. *(RSS avoids a known problem MSU that occurs
when the microwave beam reflects off ice surfaces by
excluding the poles.)


Classic global warming theory from Arrhenius predicts
greater warming rates in dry areas like the American West
and heartland than more most regions.


These lower troposphere data come from the third and ninth
columns of:


http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...onthly_MSU_AMS....


Though the continental USA is only about 1.5% of the globe's
area, there are more than enough data to support this statement.


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Call:
lm(formula = LaN825S700 ~ YEARMON)


Residuals:
* * *Min * * * 1Q * Median * * * 3Q * * *Max
-0.41589 -0.11629 -0.00948 *0.10907 *0.73922


Coefficients:
* * * * * * Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(|t|)
(Intercept) -35.1291 * * 2.2028 * -15.9 * 2e-16 ***
YEARMON * * * 0.0177 * * 0.0011 * *16.0 * 2e-16 ***
---
Signif. codes: *0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1


Residual standard error: 0.175 on 349 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-Squared: 0.423, * * *Adjusted R-squared: 0.421
F-statistic: *255 on 1 and 349 DF, *p-value: 2e-16


- - - -


*fitted.model - lm(ContUSA ~ YEARMON)
summary(fitted.model)


Call:
lm(formula = ContUSA ~ YEARMON)


Residuals:
* * Min * * *1Q *Median * * *3Q * * Max
-3.0723 -0.4895 *0.0287 *0.5624 *2.2018


Coefficients:
* * * * * * *Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(|t|)
(Intercept) -55.26373 * 10.64006 * -5.19 *3.5e-07 ***
YEARMON * * * 0.02779 * *0.00534 * *5.21 *3.3e-07 ***
---
Signif. codes: *0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1


Residual standard error: 0.844 on 349 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-Squared: 0.0721, * * Adjusted R-squared: 0.0694
F-statistic: 27.1 on 1 and 349 DF, *p-value: 3.29e-07


The temperatures are highly suspect *Google "Watts Up"


What exactly was I supposed to see about RSS MSU
data from that exercise? *Life is too short to play
20 questions with a total jerk, so do you have a URL,
Tom?


RSS MSU is also cooked to a small extent.


Strike two!

Cooked how, prey tell?