Thread: 03:55
View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old April 7th 08, 04:05 PM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
Weatherlawyer Weatherlawyer is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 03:55

On Apr 6, 1:46 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
5.0 2008/04/06 07:23 RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA
5.0 2008/04/04 13:30 KURIL ISLANDS

Been a long break.
I can't see anything I can identify as a cause or a result on these:

http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/nmoc/l...sis/947_50.gif

There is an extensive High on the Canadian model. It's the size of
Canada. I am so used to looking at Lows that I can't tell what this
means.
Besides snow in England that is.


The high is elongating but also seems to be building, as is the one in
the E Pacific (US/Canadian side.) There hasn't been a quake of ot
greater than mag 5 in a while.

And that could indicate that the pressure systems need to leave the
mainland before there is an earthquake. Just floating the ideas of
course. I leave all the hard and fast rules to the likes of Aidan
Karley.

Whose successes have become the stuff of stuffing:
http://groups.google.com/groups/sear...gk&scorin g=d