You do realise that the short range models are only accurate once the
meteorologist has rectified all the mistakes in the various models?
Asking for better fromlong range models is stupid.

Anyway this is my stab at it:
Apr 20 / 10:25 ** * * * 04:25 * 10:25 * 16:25 * 22:25 * 4
Apr 12 / 18:32 * * * * *06:32 * 12:32 * 18:32 * 00:32 * 6
Apr 6 / 03:55 * ** * * *03:55 * 09:55 * 15:55 * 21:55 * 3
Mar 29 / 21:47 *** * * *03:47 * 09:47 * 15:47 * 21:47 * 3
Mar 21 / 18:40 *** * * *06:40 * 12: 40 *18: 40 *00: 40 *6
Mar 14 / 10:46 ** * * * 04: 46 *10: 46 *16: 46 *22:25 * 4
Mar 7 / 17:14 * * * * * 05:14 * 11:14 * 17:14 * 23:14 * 5
Feb 29 / 02:18 * * * * *02:18 * 08:18 * 14:18 * 20:18 * 2
Feb 21 / 03:31 *** * * *03: 31 *09: 31 *15: 31 *21: 31 *3

Which are dates and times of lunar phases. And their similarities are
pointed out with asterisks. The columns following them are the same
times shifted by 6 hours. They *are there to help me draw the
similarities.

So:
The 20th is similar to the phase some 5 weeks earlier: 14th March.
Which is referenced at:http://groups.google.com/group/uk.sc...m/thread/5eea3...


So you are trying to say that last month's weather was down, at least
in part, to atmospheric responses to the changing phases of the moon?

Paul