On Apr 11, 4:43*pm, Bill Ward wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:08:11 -0700, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Apr 10, 11:26*am, Peter Franks wrote: [ . . . ]
That is not a scientific response. *The question is honest and valid,
and more importantly, relevant to your original posting.

NOPE! *You're question would be on topic only if "the little ice age"
happened in the past 129 years. Otherwise, you were posting off topic.

That's a lame dodge, even for Roger. *Note he snipped the original
question, so readers can't tell it was actually spot on topic.

The topic for this thread has a title.
That title is:

"MARCH TIED FOR WARMEST ON NASAs 129-YEAR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE RECORD."

That says nothing about a little ice age.
If you want to talk about that, you are
quite free to START ANOTHER THREAD.