Thread: 12:18
View Single Post
  #19   Report Post  
Old May 8th 08, 02:36 PM posted to uk.sci.weather,alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
Weatherlawyer Weatherlawyer is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 12:18

On May 8, 12:22 pm, wrote:

....well I dare not allow myself to imagine what may come next.


Your lack of imagination aught to have a bearing on your intestinal
fortitude. However your greatest disability is the sheer volume of
ignorance you have so patiently stored between your ears.

Consider:

Of course, we must not forget the power of the moon's gravitational
pull which (although it may not have as much effect on land as it does
over the water)


Define gravity.

OK, that's an hard one for you. Let's try something easier:
Which orbits which? Does the moon go around the earth or the earth
around the moon?

In which case the attraction of the [blank] is [blanker] than that of
[blank].

Replace blank with ...

No, too difficult for you...
Let me see...

You obviously do not subscribe to Aristotle's theory of gravitational
attraction.
Where did you come up with your version of the alternative? No.. hang
on. I have got it..

Have you ever heard of a bloke called Galileo?

Ah forget it. Believe what you like.