On 10 May, 00:23, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On May 9, 9:26 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:



On May 9, 8:52 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

On May 9, 8:41 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

It's 21 hours now since the last one:

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/...quakes_big.php

And Rammasun is at hurricane force. It is slated to become a cat. 2.
Coincidence?

Perhaps.
If you care to look, you will find plenty of them.

When a couple of coincidents point to me being right, does it make you
think?

A 6.7 and smack on time too. You know what?

I am bloody good I am.

No you are not, you just think you are.

There still has not been one over 7 for 3 weeks.

(Last month, the earthquake "quack" said 'This spell runs from April
28th to May 5th. I expect an earthquake in the region of 7.3 to occur
early in it.')

However, like all bogus fortune tellers/horoscope writers there is
always a proviso such as, it may not happen because of........ (insert
pages of internet quotes, links and total bull**** designed to divert
attention from the fact that no prediction has been issued at all).

May I suggest that if you want to command any kind of respect, you
cease the Mystic Meg style of forecasting and actually predict the
precise date that a mag. 7+ earthquake will occur, preferably more
than 24 hours in advance. If you could narrow this down to a
continent, then even better.

And, you are quite welcome to fire the most vicious insults known to
man, in my direction. I dont care.

And remember - mag 6.7 does not count as 'in the region of 7.3' and
May 9th does not count as 'Apr 28th to May 5th'

Accurate forecasting becomes much harder when you are subject to very
close scrutiny and independent verification - doesn't it?