On May 10, 8:21*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
Pretty is as pretty does.
These may not be giving the information they are supposed to be doing
but if they are giving neat computer output from direct digital data
feeds, they are giving us notice of something else.

This first one for instance:https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/efs/dynam....EFS.no_pac_ga...

is obviously advising us of the Cat 2 in the Pacific.

Apparently this one needs correcting:

https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/efs/dynam....EFS.no_atl_ga...

Without the corrections -which amount to erasure I imagine, it might
help us understand what data the system holds that might be being
overlooked.

No offence to anybody in particular but it seems to be a given for
satellite data.
Not that it makes all that much difference to weather forecasting but
who cares about weather forecasts? They are inaccurate over 5 days
either way.

Perhaps, with your record since 24th June, the weather forecasts are
FAR more accurate.

Still waiting for you to back your proposed links up with forecast
accuracy data.

You're struggling aren't you..........and this won't go away.