kT wrote:
Now you nailed it! This is going to help me tremendously in understanding
mathematical modelling and climate models. Thanks a lot!
I doubt it, we've already determined from the evidence of your posts
that you are unskilled and unaware of it. Not only do you consistently
misspell it, you've demonstrated that you have very little skill in
it.
huh? ... have you heard about British English and the doubling of 'l'?

and yes, you confused Model Theory with Mathematical Modelling

And you are an absolutist as well. Model theory is a superset of just
about everything mathematical, and I'm not exactly new to this stuff :

See for instance : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Kleene
What are you saying? Are you the late Kleene? Did you take your medication
as I told you?

Computational mathematical modeling is an extremely narrow field
embedded in a much larger and richer tapestry of mathematics and
physics, and until you develop an appreciation for some of that, and
all that we don't know even know yet, you aren't going anywhere soon.
So your climate modellers aren't going anywhere, and neither is anyone else
who does any kind of modelling. It's as simple as that: model theory is not
used in mathematical modelling. You can be a great applied mathematician
and never have heard about model theory. But how would YOU know it. And by
the way - I don't believe you know anything about model theory either. You
can just copy and paste, but you do not understand a word.

Don't even try to get me going on set theory.
.... because you don't have any idea about it and will not be able to say
anything?

z