On Jul 6, 7:50*pm, Alan White wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 11:19:05 -0700 (PDT), Dawlish
wrote:

I can assure you that our correspondence (two-way, Alan, not one way,
with very similar sentiments on both sides and culminating, actually,
in no particularly bad feeling, which is good...

Here's my response to your original e-mail.

Please publish your original, with headers, so that mine is in context.
Don't miss out the bit about my festering guts.

quote
From: Alan White
To: Dawlish
Subject: World weather map
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 18:14:24 +0100
Organization: G84
Message-ID:
References:







In-Reply-To:

X-Mailer: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652

Hi,

Thanks for the e-mail. As it's considered poor netiquette to respond to
Usenet posts by e-mail, could you please post it again but this time to
uk.sci.weather where I've had my last word so there'll be no come back
from me.

I'm sorry about my spelling of ad hominum. Put it down to a combination
of waning powers, lack of breakfast, the fact that I wasn't wearing my
specs and misuse of my spellchecker. I've never visited TWO. I picked up
the phrase from a chap called James Boyle at a meeting I attended in
1989.

--
Alan White
Mozilla Firefox and Forte Agent.
Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Lochs Long and Goil in
Argyll, Scotland.
Webcam and weather:-http://windycroft.gt-britain.co.uk/weather
/quote

--
Alan White
Mozilla Firefox and Forte Agent.
Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Lochs Long and Goil in Argyll, Scotland.
Webcam and weather:-http://windycroft.gt-britain.co.uk/weather

Thought you might go down that line. I would never post personal
emails on public sites. They are what they are - personal.

Your position of support for an abusive individual is clear. Little
else to add. I look forward to your future posts on the weather.

Paul