"Nick Gardner" wrote in message
...
Denialist? Is that the latest pejorative for those of us sensible enough
not to blindly fall for the AGW propaganda?

No, it was a euphemism for those people such as yourself who think they
know better than the overwhelming majority of the world's top climate
scientists who have dedicated their lives studying atmospheric sciences
with the aid of the most powerful and complex computers ever constructed.

What are your qualifications in this subject? How long have you studied
and at which institutions to reach the opinions that you have? Where are
your peer reviewed papers and in which journals are they published? What
are your professional specialisms in the field of atmospheric processes?

Well said.
Of course the deniers' response is that all the scientists who come up
with these results are in the pay of the Government who want an
excuse to raise (green) taxes.

It's all a conspiracy theory to them and you can't debate logically with
conspiracy theorists.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl