Weatherlawyer wrote in news:c48bfe7d-9bb9-45db-
:

I came across sci.geo.earthquakes when the group was more or less
abandoned by decent experts. One or two still take the time to pop in
here from time to time.

Yeah. The decent posters left because of nuts like you
driving down down the S/N ratio.


But it had been taken over by people with
broken minds.

Like you?


Not that dissimilar to mine.

You said it.


I too had an idea and the nature to take on the last bastion of
defenders of the faith -who transmogrified into the trolls the last
vestiges of which are Skywise.

Moi? A troll?? hahahahahahah!!!! Hell.. I've been called worse
for pointing out the facts.



Since then, most have seen the error of their ways and gone on to
pasteurs knew. Cleansed, one imagines, of all appurtenances of idiocy.

No. They got tired of crap like yours.



Skywise has his own venue. He even gulls would be genii to his web,
there to offer example of "their" silliness for all to see.

(I said the posters on here had cracked minds.)

What is your obsession with crack?



Later I came across a largely defunct group called alt.talk.weather
and supposed that before Google stopped supporting it, I might take it
over.

Yep. "Take over" with your nonsensical BS.



Once in a while innocents, such as yourself, come here to ask
sensible questions.

And you drive them away never to return.


I used to point them to better places but then, lately, I thought: Why
bother? If they found this place they can find others.

So obviously you care nothing of the quality of discussion in
these groups. You think you own them or something?



If you want to know what I am posting about and can't be asked reading
my posts, or asking me directly, you won't get too far, is all I can
assure you.

Even when asked you just spout more nonsensical BS. You don't
exactly have a track record of anwering peoples questions with
something other than more irrellevant crap.



I can't assure you I would be nice to you if you did actually follow
nicer protocols. But it is a suggestion that you might bear in mind
for real life situations.

So in other words, you are admitting you're trying to **** up these
groups?


You can get useful information from either end of an horse if you know
what to look for. If you are satisfied with ****...

They get plenty of it from you.



To give folks an idea of how much McNut has polluted sci.geo.earthquake,
I used to be the top poster according to Google's stats. Not that I
really care about that. I was quite surprised to learn I held the
rank. But then this nut comes along and has managed to take the top
post in short order. And all of it with a bunch of meaningless ramblings
piled on top of each other. Ever notice how he keeps talking to himself?
The sound of his own voice must sooth him. Poor soul.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?