On 19 Sep, 17:42, Graham P Davis wrote:
Dawlish wrote:
On Sep 19, 4:31*pm, redweather wrote:
On Sep 19, 5:53*am, redweather wrote:

a href="http://www.thisisexeter.co.uk/news/Paedophile-abused-boys-

groomed-net-sites/article-259464-detail/article.html"http://www.thisisexeter.co.uk/news/Paedophile-abused-boys-groomed-net....../a



Has anyone read the link (2nd one), it's relevant. The paedo in
question is called Andrew Bond, you may be familiar with him.

Is that actually the Andrew Bond from metcheck? I'd like to clear that
up before anyone jumps to conclusions.

Apart from the distressing nature of the offences, what also bothers but
does not surprise me is that that the newspaper doesn't know what a
paedophile is. As the victims were teenagers, the crime cannot be
paedophilia.

--
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks., UK. *E-mail: newsman not newsboy

I'm afraid that you are mistaken - anyone under the age of consent is
still a minor - whether they are teenagers or not...

In law enforcement, the term "pedophile" is generally used to describe
those accused or convicted of the sexual abuse of a minor (including
both prepubescent children and adolescent minors younger than the
local age of consent).[14]