Climate Change - Drastic Action Now Needed within Two Years
Tunderbar wrote:
On Oct 7, 8:30 am, Lloyd wrote:
On Oct 6, 5:11 pm, Michael Dobony wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:16:08 -0500, Ouroboros_Rex wrote:
Tunderbar wrote:
On Oct 6, 10:53 am, David wrote:
Accuweather - Brett
Andersonhttp://global-warming.accuweather.com/2008/10/drastic_action_now_need...
David Christainsen - meteorologist
Sounding a tad desperate. No one is buying this agw crap anymore,
Except for every reputable scientific organization and national
government on earth.
But keep lying, it's funny. lol
Exciusse me, but the reputable scientists who have nothing to gain
reject GW.
Excuse me, but you're stupid. Every scientific body in the world
accepts GW. Every publication in major scientific journals does
too.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Every scientific body that recognises agw as a potential research
windfall worth in the billions.
How can you say that major scientific journals accepts agw? Aren't
they supposed to be neutral and simply provide publishing services to
the researchers? Do you have any proof that scientific journals accept
agw?
See alt.global-warming, where such proof is offered regularly. lol
|