On Oct 12, 9:15*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Oct 12, 8:41*am, Dawlish wrote:



Abuse, as usual. I was questioning your understanding of "dull and
overcast" when applied to the UK and not just your own back garden.

Now Dawlish my pet, I could never insult you. Take you to the vet's
perhaps and stop you humping lamp posts maybe but, ...insult you?

Impossible.

Have a biscuit, there's a good boy.

Any chance of answering the question about "dull and overcast"
yesterday, instead of continuing the abuse? You forecast "dull and
overcast" using your "spells" and it patently wasn't. Return to your
forecast and explain it. You are just prevaricating when your theory
doesn't work - as always.

Or continue to evade it and continue your abuse of the questioner?
(Which is far more probable)