On Oct 30, 8:45 pm, Roger Coppock

They simulated the Earth by shining a light
through the clear mylar on one side onto
a black painted surface at the other side.

This is fraud. One does not need to use visible light on cardboard to
reproduce the infrared energy of the earth.

The fact that you need visible light shows your fraud. Certainly the
earth is warmed by the visible light from the sun. But this energy is
absorbed and radiated back at earth's temperatures which can be
duplicated more effectively than shining visible light on cardboard.
When visible light is absorbed by cardboard, it is radiated quickly
and mostly in high energy wavelengths from .7 um to 5 um.

This is not replicative of earth's radiation. It is only the 15um band
which is important in greenhouse theory. This has NOTHING to do with
the absorption of visible light by black cardboard. The use of
generalized terms to derive analogies and false exhibition of any
factual accounting of this exhibit to demonstrate or validate
greenhouse theory is a very serious crime, in the right
circumstances.

IF YOUR EXPERIMENT IS VALID, SHOW US THE RESULTS WITHOUT THE IMMEDIATE
ABSORPTION OF VISIBLE LIGHT, AND DONE WITH RADIATION SIMILAR TO THAT
FROM THE TEMPERATURES OF EARTH.
OTHERWISE YOU MERELY CONTINUE WITH AN EXHIBIT WHICH CAN BE PROVED
INVALID WHICH PROVES YOU GUILTY OF A SERIOUS CRIME.

In any amount of CO2, there is some amount of CO. CO and methane
oxidize in the presence of oxygen. Free hydrogen, and the OH ion also
oxidize.
The induction of visible light and production of high energy infrareds
from absorption by black cardboard, would certainly enhance the normal
oxidation of CO and methane. Methane completely oxidizes in the
atmosphere IN 12 years, which is one reason it is not an environmental
concern, dispite the FRAUD of the greenie weenie climate alarmists.

In order for you to state your conclusions without being directly
proved to have intent to defraud, you must apply the controls
neccassary to show that oxidation is not occurring which would be
adding heat energy to the exhibit, and all the proper controls which
include substance of containment. But you are not a scientist, nor
are you interested in science. So continue with your fraud and
psychological disease, poopycock.

There are real people out there whom you wish to screw with for your
fake interest in saving us from global warming. But we know your
little brain cannot encompass such facts.

KD