On Nov 15, 3:08*pm, "DeadFrog" wrote:
"john fernbach" wrote in message

...
This dialogue so far is really strange.

Roger Coppock offers one of his usual posts filled with NASA
temperature data and discussions of its statistical significance.
It's the kind of thing that unfortunately (no offense, Roger) often
puts people to sleep.

But kdth = Keith then responds with comments about Roger's "freaky
pud" and [allegedly] "stunted sexuality."

Does anybody in here know whether Keith usually responds with
homoerotic sexual fantasies to other people's discussions about
statistics?
*********************************************
John, the guy (kdth) is obviously queer and trying to repress it. We can see
that isn't working, just killfile the poor queen.

Well, that's okay - I have nothing against him being queer or
straight, whichever he wants: it's really none of my business. "Life,
liberty and the pursuit of happiness" - rights that are "inalienable"
according to the US Declaration of Independence. However someone
wants to engage in the "pursuit of happiness" is up to him (or her).

But it's really inappropriate to keep dragging sexual fantasies into
debates about climate trends.

No matter what your sexual preference is and no matter what side of
the AGW issue you choose, you just confuse yourself when you get your
sexual fantasies mixed up with your ideas about global warming. It's
sloppy thinking.