On Dec 16, 11:28*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
November was 5th Warmest on the 129-year NASA record.

In the real world,
outside the fossil fuel industry's spin and lies,
global mean surface temperatures continue to rise.

These globally averaged temperature data come from NASAhttp://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt
They represent the results of tens of millions of readings
taken at thousands of land stations and ships around the globe
over the last 129 years. *Yes, the land data are corrected for
the urban heat island effect. *The sea data do not need to be.
There are few urban centers in the sea.

The last 128 yearly means of these data are graphed athttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/Global%20Mean%20Temp.jpg

The Mean November temperature over the last 129 years is 13.979 C.
The Variance is 0.06829.
The Standard Deviation, or SIGMA, is 0.2613.

Rxy 0.7849 * Rxy^2 0.6161
TEMP = 13.620641 + (0.005508 * (YEAR-1879))
Degrees of Freedom = 127 * * * * F = 203.827788
Confidence of nonzero correlation = approximately
0.999999999999999999999999999 (27 nines), which is darn close to 100%!

The month of November in the year 2008,
is linearly projected to be 14.331,
* * * * * * * * *yet it was 14.58. -- One SIGMA above the projected.
The sum of the absolute errors is 17.133757

Equal weight exponential least squares fit:
TEMP = 13.624155 * e^(.0003946 * (YEAR-1879))
The sum of the absolute errors is 17.092657

*Rank of the months of November
Year * Temp C * Anomaly * Z score
2001 * 14.67 * * 0.691 * * 2.65
2006 * 14.65 * * 0.671 * * 2.57
2005 * 14.64 * * 0.661 * * 2.53
2004 * 14.63 * * 0.651 * * 2.49
2008 * 14.58 * * 0.601 * * 2.30 --
1997 * 14.56 * * 0.581 * * 2.22
2002 * 14.51 * * 0.531 * * 2.03
2003 * 14.49 * * 0.511 * * 1.96
2007 * 14.48 * * 0.501 * * 1.92
1998 * 14.43 * * 0.451 * * 1.73
1990 * 14.41 * * 0.431 * * 1.65
1995 * 14.37 * * 0.391 * * 1.50
1996 * 14.35 * * 0.371 * * 1.42
MEAN * 13.979 * *0.000 * * 0.00
1906 * 13.65 * *-0.329 * *-1.26
1889 * 13.65 * *-0.329 * *-1.26
1898 * 13.61 * *-0.369 * *-1.41
1894 * 13.61 * *-0.369 * *-1.41
1887 * 13.61 * *-0.369 * *-1.41
1916 * 13.60 * *-0.379 * *-1.45
1891 * 13.60 * *-0.379 * *-1.45
1910 * 13.59 * *-0.389 * *-1.49
1908 * 13.59 * *-0.389 * *-1.49
1902 * 13.59 * *-0.389 * *-1.49
1892 * 13.58 * *-0.399 * *-1.53
1907 * 13.57 * *-0.409 * *-1.56
1919 * 13.55 * *-0.429 * *-1.64
1890 * 13.48 * *-0.499 * *-1.91

The most recent 177 continuous months, or 14 years and 9 months,
on this GLB.Ts+dSST.txt data set are all above the 1951-1980
data set norm of 14 C.
There are 1547 months of data on this data set:
* -- 668 of them are at or above the norm.
* -- 879 of them are below the norm.
This run of 177 months above the norm is the result of a warming
world. *It is too large to occur by chance at any reasonable level
of confidence. *A major volcano eruption, thermonuclear war, or
meteor impact could stop this warming trend for a couple of years,
otherwise expect it to continue.

Is that with new and different fudgings by Hansen? Or with the
previous months temps "mistakenly" being used instead of the actual
months temps (AGAIN)? What *******izations and manipulations did it
take for you assholes to come up with that? You ****ers can't be
trusted with reading a single mercury thermometer in your own
backyard, never mind presenting statistical compilations from datasets
from around the world. ****ing idiots.