View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old December 17th 08, 06:54 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
Pete L Pete L is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Aug 2003
Posts: 246
Default 2008 World Temperatures

On 17 Dec, 17:19, Mike Tullett wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:39:37 -0800 (PST), Pete L wrote in


http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/scien...re/7786060.stm


Just looking at the figures on the above link.....


Can anybody explain how and why two significant decimal places are
considered? As far as I recollect an ordinary mercury thermometer is
accurate to 0.2 deg. So to suggest global mean temperatures are 14.31
degs seems totally meaningless. I would have though just 14 degs is
enough without trying to invent a greater accuracy.


I think that precision is justified when it is based on hundreds or
thousands of mean temperatures.

--
Mike Tullett - Coleraine 55.13°N 6.69°W *posted 17/12/2008 17:19:42 *GMT


So, you suggest that the error cancels itself out with thousands of
mean temps? That supposes that there is an equal number of
thermometers reading high and low. Seems a bit unlikely.