On 6 Jan, 12:08, Graham Easterling wrote:
On 6 Jan, 08:14, Paul Hyett wrote:





On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 at 23:11:50, John Horobin
wrote in uk.sci.weather :

From: "John Hall"

I suppose it's possible. The peak of the Little Ice Age is supposed to
have pretty much coincided with a long period of very low sunspot levels
lasting from 1645 to 1715 known as the Maunder Minimum.

There is certainly speculation that the Sun may be entering another Dalton
minimum - 1790 to 1830 *- also a period of lower global temperatires -
certainly looks as if the normal sunspot cycle has been disrupted.

Can't wait to see the GW advocates squirm...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham (change 'invalid83261' to 'blueyonder' to email me)

I would have thought, assuming there is a link between sun spot
activity and global cooling, that the fact that globally 2008 was
still significantly warmer than the mean for 1971-2000 despite very
low sun spot activity, is a strong argument in favour of AGW.

Graham
Penzance- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Graham,

On one of the websites I was looking at, it said there is about a 5yr
time lag between lower solar activity and lower global temperatures.