"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
On Jan 12, 12:01 pm, "1-20-08 The Start of an Abomination"
Abomination @White HOuse.org wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message

...
On Jan 12, 11:37 am, "1-20-08 The Start of an Abomination"

Abomination @White HOuse.org wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message

...
Latest Hadley Sea Temperature Data Show Accelerated Warming!

Please see:
http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/HadSST2gl.jpg

The Sea Surface Temperature data, or SST, record an
accelerated temperature increase. Here, from Hadley
Centre, are the global sea surface temperatures from
1850 to 2008.

=============

Wow , i didnt know that the oceans were full of temperature monitoing
stations in the 1800's. Exactly where were they located . Cite us both
locatons and numbers and the type of thermometer that was used back then
and
it's accuracy and error rates.

If you had followed my second URL,
you would have found this:

http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/#sciref

It pays to read before asking questions.
===================

from your cite:

The number of available stations was small during the 1850s, but increases
to over 3000 stations during the 1951-90 period.

Thus we can ignore the infinitely small data samples from the 1850's to
the

We can ignore the data? Really?

1950's because the temperature data is inaccurate . Just like

The data are inaccurate? Really?
What data disagree with it?
=================

Since you have no data from all those locaton in the 1800's that had no
stations, you cant compare their missing data with data from today . Just
like you cant compare data statons from the dinosauer ages BECAUSE THERE
WERE'NT ANY.