On Jan 20, 7:30*am, wrote:
Green Turtle wrote:
wrote in message
....
...or maybe he doesn't have any original research to present and is
just going to re-hash the usual Denialist bull****....
The above explains how the small change in the sun can result is a larger
change on earth due to climate amplifiers...

Just how does this negate the greenhouse effect of the massive amounts
of CO2 humans are emitting and the huge global warming anomaly of the
last half century?

Are you saying you can only cope with the idea of one single factor
affecting climate changes?

And, if co2 was such a big driver, then why from 1940 to 1970 during the
HUGE industrial boom when all that co2 was being output was the tempatures
dropping?

Solar shading caused by particulate emission. Humans caused that and
humans fixed it by reducing particulate emissions.
Are you seriously admitting you didn't know that?

* And, why do we now see temperatures going down if co2 was such the
huge main

big devil driver it made out to me?

We aren't seeing temperatures going down. You're quoting a denialist
fantasy.

Another problem with the argument is the wording: "why do we see ..
etc. ... if CO2 was such the huge main big devil driver it was made
out to be?"

My sympathies to the Denier who wrote this and left in typos - I leave
too many typos in my work.

But "big devil driver" is loaded language, because "devil" is almost
always loaded language. Responsible and serious climate scientists
don't think of atmospheric CO2 as a "devil driver," they think of it
as a factor in the global climate system that's out of balance.