On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:30:10 -0800, sandy.bloxs wrote:



Green Turtle wrote:

wrote in message
...

...or maybe he doesn't have any original research to present and is
just going to re-hash the usual Denialist bull****....

The above explains how the small change in the sun can result is a
larger change on earth due to climate amplifiers...

Just how does this negate the greenhouse effect of the massive amounts of
CO2 humans are emitting and the huge global warming anomaly of the last
half century?

Are you saying you can only cope with the idea of one single factor
affecting climate changes?

So are you claiming there are a number of factors other than CO2 that
significantly affect climate? If so, can you list them all?

And, if co2 was such a big driver, then why from 1940 to 1970 during
the HUGE industrial boom when all that co2 was being output was the
tempatures dropping?

Solar shading caused by particulate emission. Humans caused that and
humans fixed it by reducing particulate emissions. Are you seriously
admitting you didn't know that?

And, why do we now see temperatures going down if co2 was such the
huge main
big devil driver it made out to me?

We aren't seeing temperatures going down. You're quoting a denialist
fantasy.

Six years is a pretty long fantasy. But trends don't really matter in
chaotic systems anyway. All we can know for sure is that temperature will
go up until it starts down and then eventually go up again to repeat the
process. The timing is unknowable.