Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorry greenie weenies, but no cigar!!!
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:40:08 -0600, §ñühw¤£f
wrote:
Kali pinched out a steaming pile
:
In article ,
says...
TimK wrote:
"§tarkiller©" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:11:48 -0800 (PST), Ed
wrote:
But so far none of you have presented anything proving man made
GW other than "the consensus says".
Hey moron, go to google scholar and look at all the cites for
yourself.
Google James Hansen and read about how the Bush administration,
people with
no credentials, altered his testimony to Congress in an all-out
war on
science.
****wit.
Ive found its a zero-sum game to try and educate the flat-earthers
in
the GW deniers camp.
^_^
Same here, but fortunately, with science given the respect it
deserves over the next (at least) eight years, there will be less
and less flat earthers In the future.
In terms of legislation and government perhaps.
But most of the public gets their memes from the likes of Limbaugh et
al...
So the masses will remain willfully, gleefully ignorant and proud of
it.
But, hopefully, they'll have less chance of being successful at
forcing their ignorance onto everyone else (creationism in science
classes, etc.).
^_^
|