On Feb 18, 12:17 am, "Ric Brown" wrote:

It boggles the mind that charlatans are STILL denying climate change in
spite of the overwhelming scientific evidence for it. With this
head-in-the-sand crowd, it's clearly nothing more than yet another
indefensible POLITICAL stance.

----------

Political Propaganda 101.

If you are charlatan, your first defense when it's pointed out is to
call your opposition "charlatans". Nobody will check to see if you are
lying.

If your evidence is wrong, non-existent, or heavily "spun", term it
"overwhelming scientific evidence" even though it's diametrically
opposed to any real "science". Nobody will be able to check to see if
you are lying except real scientists and if they say anything you can
cut their funding and fire them.

Cleverly shift the issue from real issues (does man made CO2 cause
global warming?...No, it does not. It's impossible for it to have any
significant effect) to a non-issue where you can say you were "right"
all along: climate change. (Climate has been cyclically changing since
the beginning of the earth so obviously if called on your lies, you
can point to this and say you were "right" all along!)

If people take enough of an active interest in what you are saying to
start to point out the lies in it, turn that upside down and claim
they have their "head in the sand". Of course that is EXACTLY where
you want them to be!

Finally, When YOUR position is nothing but made-up propaganda for
political purposes (all propaganda is for political purposes!)
cleverly turn it around and say that your opposition is arguing based
on a "POLITICAL stance"! Hey, if "carbon taxes and credits" designed
to redistribute wealth isn't political what in hell is?

The bottom line, "Ric" is that nothing you say is at all true (except
the part about climate change being "real") and like any good
criminal, when you are caught in the middle of a crime you loudly say
it was the VICTIMS and not you who were perpetrating the crimes! Good
job.

-----