You are playing a very dangerous game with the truth mister.

If you have the any kind of intellectual skills you will examine the
following historical records:

http://www.spaceweather.com/archive....h=02&year=2009
http://www.spaceweather.com/archive....h=02&year=2009
http://www.spaceweather.com/archive....h=02&year=2009
http://www.spaceweather.com/archive....h=02&year=2009

They show a sunspot group that barely survived for longer than 24 hours.

I shall challenge you to a duel with pistols at 20 paces in 24 hours.


wrote in message
...
In sci.physics kiloVolts
mantrap@r1w4u5t5s0s3a4s6e3f5g6rh4h4d4q6a3s2ax7a2d 5y6j1z4s2.com wrote:
wrote in message
...
In sci.physics kiloVolts
mantrap@r1w4u5t5s0s3a4s6e3f5g6rh4h5d4q2a3s2ax7a2d 5y6j1z4s.com wrote:
February 25, 2009

The face of the Sun is without blemish:
http://mdisas.nascom.nasa.gov/gif_he...t_igram_fd.gif

Nope, SSN:12 from 1013 and they are cycle 24 spots.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

What a moron you are. Look at the gif image from the URL link I provided.
Examine the date and the time, idiot. If you had any smarts when it comes
to
solar science, you would know that the tiny speck to which you refer will
not last hours.

Gibbering idiot, if you actually had the slightest interest in current
solar conditions you would have the Propfire plugin installed in your
browser and would know the SSN is currently 12 and has been all day.

And you would also know that you aren't going to see ANY sunspots on
the image you referenced unless it is a BIG group.

Now, because of you and your stupidity I will need to report the message
that you defaced.

Are you 10 years old, on drugs, or insane?



--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.