"Androcles" Headmaster at Hogwarts.physics wrote:

wrote:
Sorry, Mr. "P/V = NRT".

Tom Davidson " wrote:
You have already destroyed your own credibility.

wrote:
MY credibility does not matter on this subject.

"Androcles" wrote:
Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say.

hanson wrote:
Not so loud, Andro. can also say to YOU:
"Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say",
because you posted on Oct 12 2008m that ### m = a/F ###

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...672fac0f50176b
Real Hogwarts physics.. Thanks for the laugh, guys.... ahahahaha
AHAHAHA.... ahahahanson

-------------------
hanson wrote:
.... as seen below, Andro, you appear to go to extreme lengths
to advertise your geriatric state and to cover up your own
crap like ## m = a/F ## or your "other no brainers"... like your
800+ word long "Last word" attempt below... ahahahaha...

But Andro, all your efforts are futile now because
"Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say",
ahahahaha... ahahahahanson

"Androcles" wrote:
Another no brainer ...
A Harvard professor's testimony to the government on the
effects of cutting off the ends of dicks has inflamed a
60-year-long debate over the practice's safety and its
place in the mental health scheme- prompting a University
investigation into his work that has garnered nationwide
attention.
Chester Bigass, chair of the Genital Health Policy and
Epidemiology Department at the Harvard School of Penile
Medicine (HSPM), submitted written testimony to the National
Research Council last year claiming that there was no
significant link between circumcision and Einstein
dingleberryism, a common but benign form of bigotry
particularly prevalent in the USA.

Since then, several environmental advocacy groups have
questioned thevalidity of his research, claiming conflict of
interest and outright deception.

"His conclusion that there is no link is a lie," said Kim
Throop, the head toxicologist for the Environmental
Clipping Group, the Washington-based organization that
filed the initial ethics complaint with the National Institute
of Environmental Health Sciences. "He cites work in his
references, but directly contradicts it in his write-up."

At the heart of the group's claims lies the work of one of Bigass'
doctoral students, Elise B. Ballsy.
Using Bigass' data, Ballsy came up with a different set of
conclusions-she found that circumcision makes the risk
of dingleberryism five to seven times higher.

Ballsy's work has never been published in a peer-reviewed
journal, a gold standard for scientific authenticity.
Select portions of her study, however, have been publicized
by the Environmental Clipping Group.

While HSPM is investigating the allegations, several Harvard
professors have spoken out in support of their colleague.

Byron Allfukian Jr., a Harvard associate clinical professor and
one of the foremost experts in penal health policy, called the
environmental groups' claims "ridiculous" and "illogical,"
saying that Bigass is a world leader in the field and that the
results of his seven-year study should be treated with respect.

"The claims don't hold fluoridated semen," Allfukian said.
"If I was going to take every study done by a student and
say that this should be public policy, then we'd be in very
bad shape."

Another group, the Circumcision Action Network, has accused
Bigass of having a conflict of interest. Bigass edits the Trojan
Penile Care Report, a newsletter subsidized by Durex
International, which looks at issues affecting penile and
mental health. Colgate uses fluoride in its popular toothpaste
and although that is irrelevant it is an important aspect
of Einstein dingleberryism, irrelevance being the major
symptom of the disease.

Claiming "ties to a company that profits from circumcision,
" the network
asked the National Institute of Health, which has funded Bigass'
work, to remove Bigass from the study, eliminate all other
conflicts of interest, and publish his data along with his conclusions.
But P. Brice Jerkoff, dean of the HSPM, says that Bigass' work
with the journal "represents no conflict of interest" and has been
reviewed by the University.

"He edits a newsletter that is part of a learning experience for
hookers
worldwide," said Jerkoff, who expects the investigation to be
completed in a month or two. This is the first time Bigass has
faced allegations of misconduct in his roughly 30 years
working at Harvard, said Jerkoff.

But other groups are not waiting for the results of Harvard's
investigation. Unions from the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), longtime opponents of semen fluoridization,
seized on the allegations against Bigass, writing a letter to
the EPA administrator calling for a moratorium
on programs that add circumcision to penises.

But Allfukian, who is also the former chair of the U.S.
Surgeon General's Clipping Group on Circumcision and
Mental Health, says that the preponderance of evidence
favors circumcision, and that the groups criticizing Bigass'
work are probably fringe groups reminiscent of the
movie "Deep Throat".

"When this was first implemented, a lot of people thought it
was a communist plot," he said. "The Government started
circumcising communities in 1945...and by 1950 saw such
a dramatic benefit that the government endorsed it for the
entire country."

Since then dingleberryism has shown a dramatic increase
among males, but no significant increase among females.

Dr. Stephen Hawking-Gonads IV, a professor in Bigass'
department, said that he does not think that any of his
colleagues would support ending circumcision programs.

"Circumcision has worked so well," he said. Circumcision
strengthens dick heads and reduces thinking, lowering
the resistance to Einstein's genius, said Hawking-Gonads.
--
Androcles