On Feb 24, 7:06*pm, "Androcles" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Feb 24, 3:54 pm, " wrote:

On Feb 22, 12:04 pm, wrote:

Sorry, Mr. "P/V = NRT".

You have already destroyed your own credibility.

MY credibility does not matter on this subject.
====================================
Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say.

Each individual fact or statement must be considered for credibility.
It is of no use to simply evaluate the source. But in your need to
deny scientific fact, you and the demented and mathematically
illiterate fools rely upon denigration of the source, in order to
psychologically return to your delusions.

Now this is funny. In the discusion I posted, P/V = NRT.
In earlier posts than this, I clearly posted PV = NRT.

You have no credibility, since it PROVES you have no comprehension of
the perfect gas law.

And yet you base your lives upon the farts that come out of your mouth
which sound like, "greenhouse gases".
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

So ignore what I say, in preclusion. If I repeat cold provable facts,
you can ignore those also.

When evaluating relative proportions of P, V and T, in this form when
T increases, P increases as a direct proportion. Volume is till 1. If
the pressure is held constant and temperature increases, the value for
the inverse relationship is always a common product of the variables.
So one simply multiplies the denominator by the increase of T, in
order to derive the increase of volume, which will then equal the new
value for the equation with the increase of T. By changing N, which is
the number of moles or amount of the gas, gases can be kept at any
temperature and any pressure or volume. Temperature is not dependent
upon pressure or volume, but on ambient temperature or density of the
radition field in which it exists.

It is proper to write P/V = NRT. Pressure and volume are an inverse
propotionality. You should review your basics as we are when we
evalluate your credibility. When the formula is written, PV = NRT, one
must innately understand that the pressure and volume are an inverse
relationship and that the T is not dependent upon these two variables
as could be falsly implied. If pressure or volume change, the other
changes as an inverse relation. To increase volume by 2, decreases
pressure by 1/2. To increase the pressure by 2, and then to return to
the same pressure, increases the volume by 2.

Is that over your head, duffus ****? Apparently it is. That you
assholes are so mathematically inept to basic differentiation and all
you do is supposed, 'science', is amazing.

So if T increases by 2.4, this would increase the pressure by 2.4 at
constant volume. But if pressure is held constant, or returned to 1,
to maintain the new ratio of the content of energy to surface area of
the pressure in relation to the previous state, the denominator is
simply multiplied by the increased value of the temperature.

KD