View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 15th 09, 04:19 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology,alt.conspiracy
Stan Kellett Stan Kellett is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2004
Posts: 82
Default "The Age of Stupid"

I have just looked at both these graphs and they are NOT forecasts. The
lower rate increase in the rate of warming is averaged over 150 years the
higher increasing rate is over the last 50 years. As these are based on
actual values then this is worrying as it shows that not only is the
acceleration in rate of warming increasing but this acceleration is also
increasing.

If I have misread the graphs then don't flame me but please explain how my
analysis of the two graphs is incorrect.

thanks Stan

"Bruce Richmond" wrote in message
...
On Mar 15, 11:00 am, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Mar 14, 10:41 am, "Stan Kellett"
wrote:

Accordingly this movie is based on real science however they are using
the
worse case scenario.


However remember the worst case scenario forecast 10 years ago is now
the
most likely. And before anyone states the slight dip over last couple
of
years this was forecast by all scientists as sun is in an inactive
phase and
some natural Oceanographic effects countering the AGW effect are
happening.
Once these phases go into a natural warming then we will start seeing
the
AGW accelerating.


Stan: when you filter out the natural noise,
the rise in the global mean surface temperature
is already accelerating, as it has for some time now.
Please see:

http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/Slope1952-2007.jpg

http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/hadSlope1850-2008.jpg


I see that one predicts about five times the acceleration of the
other. Great accuracy.......NOT