Col wrote:
"smallbabe" wrote in message
...
On Mar 28, 6:46 am, "Col" wrote:
"smallbabe" wrote in message

...
On Mar 27, 7:57 pm, "Col" wrote:

"smallbabe" wrote in message

He is also the first to hold up his hands and admit when one of
his forecasts goes wrong.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl

Does he Col? Have you always Will? Where's the evidence?

In my experience, yes he does.

Where's the
evidence for any single Internet weather group forecaster/ hunch-
merchant being of any use whatsoever?

I can't vouch for any others, but I wasn't talking about any others.
I was talking about Will.

In my 6 years of Internet
weather groups I haven't found a single one (and I really do mean not
a single one - if there is one, someone show me and if no-one does, or
no-one comes forward with their own records, it proves my point
perfectly)

Erm no, actually.
You are the one making the assertion, it is up to *you* to demonstrate
your point, not challenging others to counter your argument and if they
fail to do so, considering your point to be proven.


PS That applies to the idiot who thinks he has solved the problem of
forecasting earthquakes too. As soon as I debunked that, by actually
following and analysing his forecasts, sulks, insults and profanities
were offered in place of evidence that the forecasts were in any way
correct.

Even the most casual of observers could work out that Weatherlawyer's
ramblings are utter nonsense. Only you ever actually bothered to
*prove* it

Ah, it's Weatherlawyer. I was trying to work out who the idiot was that
you were replying to, Col. The person was obviously in my killfile as I
never received the original. Killfiles are obviously useful. ;-)

--
Howard Neil