On Mar 28, 2:54*pm, wrote:
On Mar 28, 11:31*am, "Nick Gardner"

wrote:
Paul

Will's 'forecast' was just a bit of fun.

Let's stop being so overtly critical of each other, it's not good.

And can't we just be a little nicer to each other, it's not hard.

* * * * It's very hard for some people, as we all know, and the
problem is that it infects the whole site, raises the temperature and
brings out the worst in everyone.

Welcome back anyway.

You cannot be serious. *This group will become fractious and ill-
tempered and no good will come of it.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

Remember the "c" word you stooped to using Hughes? You could get
fractious and ill tempered and throw your toys out of the pram at a
cat crossing your lawn. I think you are most easily stirred
contributer to this group and you are certainly the most unpleasant to
deal with when you get angry - which happens unnecessarily often. You
are best ignored. There are other members of this group that,
fortunately, did not come out of the same mould as your foul-mouthed
self.

Hughes patently hasn't the wherewithal, but can anyone else point to a
single contributor, on here, or any other usegroup whose forecasts can
be decribed as being useful, on an outcome success basis? No-one yet
has and it is my standpoint that no-one can.