Roger Coppock wrote:

"But, I wasn't discussing Paleoclimatology.
You just tried to change the subject, again."


Reply:
Your the one that mentioned a time period. 130 years.
You claim that the temperature has something to do with Global
Warming. If you wish to discuss Global Warming you must take into
account the historical climate of the Earth in order to determine if
climate change now is unusual or not in the greater context.
Anything less is just a political agenda on your part using Global
Warming as an excuse.


Roger Coppock wrote:

"Yet, you fossil fools conclude that there
is a current cooling trend from less than
a decade of data. So then, 8 years is
enough for a fossil fool to claim a cooling
trend, but 130 years is not enough for
mainstream science to conclude a warming
trend. LOL! "


Reply:

You guys claim one or two hot summers in Australia is
proof of Global Warming.
If Tucson Arizona has record hot day, you guys mention it in this
list. Why? The unmentioned implication is that it is because of Global
Warming. California wild fires? Global Warming right?

if you guys can use one or two hot summers in Australia, why can't
we use eight or ten years?

And those are just year by year, not over long periods of time. But
you guys feel it is evidence.
However, the funny thing is, if Alaska and Canada have a record cold
summer, or China has a record breaking cold winter etc. the skeptics
are not allowed to use that as evidence of anything.

Warmist alarmists. They want it all ways. They want their cake and
eat it too. But skeptics aren't allowed to use the same tactics.

Funny.