"Peter Muehlbauer" wrote in message
enexpress.de...
What A. Fool wrote:

That's correct.
But like GISS data, I presume min high data is also invalid data due to
reasons shown at surfacestations.org.

IOW we have more than a century of crap data, used to show an evidence by
those AGW turds.


And it is impossible to remove (or even estimate) the exact UHI amount at
each station.
Corrupt data must be discarded.

There is some good, scientific surface data at the Antarctic stations.
Halley, Amundsen-Scott, and Vostok.
50 years of data at each station show exactly zero warming.