On Apr 2, 8:13*pm, "bw" wrote:
"Peter Muehlbauer" wrote in message

enexpress.de...

What A. Fool wrote:

That's correct.
But like GISS data, I presume min high data is also invalid data due to
reasons shown at surfacestations.org.

IOW we have more than a century of crap data, used to show an evidence by
those AGW turds.

And it is impossible to remove (or even estimate) the exact UHI amount at
each station.
Corrupt data must be discarded.

Discard all the data, and offer nothing better.
That's why you're called deniers.


There is some good, scientific surface data at the Antarctic stations.
Halley, Amundsen-Scott, and Vostok.

Give the URL to the actual data please.

50 years of data at each station show exactly zero warming.

Three stations in Antarctica are the globe.
They aren't even a good sample of Antarctica.