On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:39:57 -0700, Roger Coppock wrote:

On Apr 2, 8:13Â*pm, "bw" wrote:
"Peter Muehlbauer" wrote in message

enexpress.de...

What A. Fool wrote:

That's correct.
But like GISS data, I presume min high data is also invalid data due
to reasons shown at surfacestations.org.

IOW we have more than a century of crap data, used to show an
evidence by those AGW turds.

And it is impossible to remove (or even estimate) the exact UHI amount
at each station.
Corrupt data must be discarded.

Discard all the data, and offer nothing better. That's why you're called
deniers.

And that's how we know Roger doesn't understand science.

There is some good, scientific surface data at the Antarctic stations.
Halley, Amundsen-Scott, and Vostok.

Give the URL to the actual data please.

50 years of data at each station show exactly zero warming.

Three stations in Antarctica are the globe. They aren't even a good
sample of Antarctica.