"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
...
On Apr 2, 8:13 pm, "bw" wrote:
And it is impossible to remove (or even estimate) the exact UHI amount at
each station.
Corrupt data must be discarded.

Discard all the data, and offer nothing better.

I don't have to provide anything to you.
I'm not making rediculous claims about global warming.

There is some good, scientific surface data at the Antarctic stations.
Halley, Amundsen-Scott, and Vostok.

Give the URL to the actual data please.

A-S
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gi..._ neighbors=1

Halley
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gi..._ neighbors=1

Vostok
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gi..._ neighbors=1


50 years of data at each station show exactly zero warming.

Three stations in Antarctica are the globe.
They aren't even a good sample of Antarctica.

Evidence for this statement? All three stations are widely spread on the
continent, all show zero warming.
All three stations were set up by scientists, from three different nations.
All are located in areas that are homogeneous and un-affected by any UHI
effects.
Hansen's own data from these three stations totally refute all arguments for
global warming. This is because the models predict most of the warming to
occur at the poles.