On Apr 7, 2:20*am, Mr Right wrote:
[ . . . ]
Roger, and all other AGW Alarmist Crackpots, refuse to look at any
temperatures that occurred after the warm spike (because it proves
that AGW is wrong)

We do look at it.
When we look at those few years we discover
not much significance. It takes about three
decades to establish significant trends. As
I said:

Now be a good first year statistics student and compute
R squared a p-value for your cherry pie. A R-squared
of 0 and p-value of 0.359 is not significant. These
data do not support your statement about a cooling trend
over the last 10 years.

Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(|t|)
(Intercept) 9.09247 9.62200 0.94 0.35
YEARMON[K:length(YEARMON)] -0.00442 0.00480 -0.92 0.36

Residual standard error: 0.181 on 133 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-Squared: 0.00634, Adjusted R-squared: -0.00113
F-statistic: 0.849 on 1 and 133 DF, p-value: 0.359