On Apr 12, 3:00*pm, Marvin the Martian wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:38:01 +0100, Cwatters wrote:
"Marvin the Martian" wrote in message
...
* Unlike the CO2 theory and the red herring irradiance argument,
* Svensmark
theory SHOULD work, and it shows good agreement with 4.5 billion years
of climate data. The Anthropogenic Global warming people don't even
have a hypothesis anymo all their much vaunted "computer models"
that were fabricated by simple curve fitting failed to predict the last
decade of non-warming.

I guess you haven't heard they attribute that to La Nina...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7786060.stm

And what causes "La Nina"? Your argument is circular. I point out that we
are at a solar minimum and thus, by Svensmark's theory, the climate
should be colder.

The first guy denies that it was colder.

You admit it's colder but attribute the colder climate to the ... climate..

You guys are not logical. No wonder you believe this stuff.

Ever watch rivulets of rain water flowing down a window pane?
Sometimes they oscillate between two meta-stable flow patterns. Since
the correlation with outside input is not obvious, you could say "the
pattern causes the pattern". It's possible climate is like that
too... at least that some such behavior is part of the mix.

Just a thought.